Get Newsletter
Notification products, updates


January 5, 2025
Amid mounting scrutiny over his performance and leadership, Rohit Sharma made the decision to “step aside” from the playing XI, paving the way for Jasprit Bumrah to take charge of the team in his absence.

Former India cricketer Navjot Singh Sidhu has strongly criticized the Indian team management over their handling of Rohit Sharma, particularly regarding his decision to opt out of the series-deciding Sydney Test against Australia. Rohit, who has been under immense pressure due to his inconsistent form and questionable captaincy decisions, found himself out of the playing XI for the crucial encounter. In his absence, Jasprit Bumrah was handed the captaincy, marking a significant shift in leadership during a high-stakes game. Sidhu’s remarks reflect growing concerns about the management’s treatment of senior players and their approach to handling criticism in pivotal moments.
In recent days, speculation has intensified about Rohit Sharma’s future as a Test cricketer, with reports suggesting that the veteran batter may no longer feature in the BCCI selectors’ long-term plans. The whispers surrounding his place in the team have added to the growing scrutiny of his recent performances and leadership on the field. Navjot Singh Sidhu, however, did not hold back in his critique of the management’s handling of the situation, accusing them of unfairly targeting the India skipper and failing to recognize his contributions over the years. “Rohit Sharma has been singled out,” Sidhu asserted, emphasizing what he perceived as unjust treatment of the experienced player. He went on to stress that decisions affecting senior players should be made with greater transparency and a sense of respect for their achievements, rather than being influenced by temporary dips in form or external pressure. Sidhu’s remarks highlight a broader concern about the fairness and consistency of the team management’s decision-making process.
“If you’re talking about collective responsibility, then it’s everyone is responsible. You can’t single out on player. Will you give Gautam Gambhir the opportunity to opt? There are only two heads. One is the captain, other is the team manager (coach). So, you won’t give Gambhir that option, that too in the middle of the series. Decision on Rohit should’ve been taken either prior to the series or after the tour. It’s our habit to judge great players on the basis of one or two bad series’,” Sidhu said while speaking to the press at an event.
Navjot Singh Sidhu labeled the decision to single out Rohit Sharma as overly emotional and lacking a balanced perspective, calling for a more consistent and objective approach from the Indian team management. He argued that if form was the primary criterion for making such decisions, the scrutiny should not have been limited to Rohit alone. Instead, it should have extended to the entire top order, many of whom have struggled to deliver impactful performances. Sidhu specifically highlighted the underwhelming form of veteran Virat Kohli, noting that Kohli’s recent outings with the bat have also fallen short of expectations. Sidhu emphasized that selective accountability creates unnecessary divisions within the team and undermines the morale of senior players, who often carry the weight of expectations on their shoulders.
“Six months ago, he was a hero lifting the T20 World Cup title. Tell me about the other top five or six batters, did any of them show any consistency? no. Conditions are very tough. Then why single out him (Rohit). When the king falls in chess, it’s the end. I am not saying it similar in cricket, but the mental stress factor is there. Having someone like a Virat, Rohit or Bumrah is massive for the team psychologically. Bumrah is a great captain, he is the future. But, they shouldn’t have press the panic button. The decision should’ve been rational, and not emotional. You have to respect your heroes. Public has short memory,” he added.